Why pay Singapore TV licence – newspaper rejects letter
In Singapore the authorities make sure you pay your TV licence fee by linking it yo your property tax. No escape, no loophole. If Malaysia can abolish the licence, why can’t Singapore?
I wrote to a local newspaper on the issue but my letter was rejected. Perhaps it saw no merit in it or for some other reason I don’t know.
This was what said:
“I fail to understand why the government continues to hand over the money on a platter to Mediacorps and the radio stations. With some 900,000 households paying the annual fees, the total amount the government rakes in comes to a staggering $99 million.
According to the authorities, TV license fees are collected with the principal aim of funding public service programmes on TV and radio.
I find it unbelievable that the cost of producing all those public service programmes can amount to some $8 million dollars a month.
Since the money is given on a platter, is there any assurance there is no wasteful expenditure? How exactly is the money used? What sorts of TV and radio programmes are funded by the fees? Does the level of viewers’ interest in such programmes justify their continuance? These are some of the questions the public would like answers to.
Public opinion is that the government should fund public service programmes from its tax revenue instead of forcing the public to bear what should be its public duty.
It bewilders me that public money is offered to private companies so easily.
If they are altruistic enough I think it is not beyond their creative ability to attract sponsors to fund the programmes
A sad consequence of the need for a TV licence fee is that poor households are forced to live without TV, or even radio,
Television and radio serve as very basic vehicles in the dissemination of news, information and entertainment. Everyone should have free access to it.
Continued insistence that households foot the bill is unfair and unjustified.”
9 Responses to “Why pay Singapore TV licence – newspaper rejects letter”
Comments are closed.